NEW TOPOGRAPHICS: “Landscape and the West – Irony and Critique in New Topographic Photography” (2005)

From Park City, Lewis Baltz

Landscape and the West – Irony and Critique in New Topographic Photography

By Kelly Dennis, Paper Presented at the Forum UNESCO University and Heritage 10th International Seminar “Cultural Landscapes in the 21st Century” Newcastle-upon-Tyne, April 11-16, 2005

Whereas Ansel Adams photographed the sinuous, abstract patterns left by timeless winds on desert sand dunes (Sand Dunes, Oceano, California, c. 1950), New Topographics photographer Robert Adams’s photograph of a similar western scene turns out to be dune-buggy tracks crisscrossing the desert floor (East of Eden, Colorado, 1977). Landscape photographs by Ansel Adams helped reinforce the image of the American West as an unspoiled wilderness throughout the Cold War era; by contrast, during the post-Vietnam war era, western landscape photography by New Topographic photographers challenged the ideology of such longstanding myths of nature and the West.

Indeed, Robert Adams, along with Lewis Baltz, Joe Deal, Art Sinsabaugh, and other New Topographics photographers, represented not the pristine western landscape of national parks’ propaganda and of the Hollywood Western1; rather, they focused on the “man-altered landscape” (Jenkins, 1975): tract houses seemingly constructed in the middle of nowhere; a drive-in movie screen silhouetted against Pike’s Peak and even blending in with the latter’s profile; roadways, road-kill, and burning oil sludges. New Topographics photography questioned the supposed distinction between cultural and natural landscapes. In doing so, the New Topographics photographers often formally refer to and ironize past images of “pristine” wilderness, such as those by nineteenth- century U.S. Geological Survey photographers Wm. Henry Jackson and Carlton Watkins from the earliest days of western expansion; as well as post-war images by West Coast landscape photographers Edward Weston and Ansel Adams of the f/64 group. New Topographics photography works powerfully—and with considerable irony—to question the validity of the centuries-old distinction between nature and culture in some of the West’s most mythologized imagery.

Yet despite the influence of New Topographics on subsequent generations of landscape photographers, little serious scholarship exists on their work. To date, the most significant and lengthy treatment of the New Topographics remains photographer and critic Deborah Bright’s 1985 essay, “Of Mother Nature and Marlboro Man” (1993). As part of a series of essays on the ideological constructions of landscape and the American West (1990, 1991), Bright’s 1985 essay positioned New Topographics within the vicissitudes of the art market. Querying “Why landscape now?” Bright observed that representations of landscape historically have served “an upper-crust cultivated taste for aestheticized nature” (1993, p. 127). She justifiably invoked the renaissance of the art market at the end of the 1970s—a commercial rebirth coming after nearly a decade of non-object oriented art movements critical of art’s institutionalization and corporate consumption, including performance, video, and conceptual art—as one context for the aesthetic consumability of the New Topographics landscape photographs.

Contextualizing the works within the conservative turn in American culture and politics in the 1980s, Bright also accused New Topographics photographers of occluding increasing corporate dominance over the “social and physical environment” under then- President Ronald Reagan. Ultimately, Bright indicted New Topographic photographers for failing to historicize their subject and for neglecting to articulate a clear social critique. Their status as mere “art objects” diminished any social concern the photographers might otherwise have intended.



From Park City, Lewis Baltz

From Park City, Lewis Baltz

Yet much of the western “expansion” pictured by the New Topographics photographs consists of mobile homes, impoverished former boomtowns, lower-middle- class housing tracts, and other signs of the lost American Dream still conventionally signified by the West. While far from overt or obvious, the images also neither sentimentalize “nature” nor simply condemn these interlopers on the Western landscape. Although I am indebted to Bright’s sustained social history of landscape photography, it does not adequately register the significant ironic dimension of New Topographics and the role of that irony in the historicizing of “postmodern” art and photography. This essay proposes to reconsider the function of irony in New Topographics photography in order to place the works within another dimension of their historical context. The photographs’ brief, non-descriptive titles, their sometimes serial installation, their clear lack of moral judgment, and the fact that many were initially published in the then-new phenomenon of photo books, all positioned these photographs not only within an art market, as Bright insists, but within a related art movement: that is, not just as art photography but as Conceptual photography.

New Topographics photographers such as Baltz, Robert Adams, Frank Gohlke, Joe Deal, and Stephen Shore, among others, acquired their name from a 1975 exhibition at the International Museum of Photography in Rochester, New Topographics, and subtitled, Photographs of a Man-Altered Landscape. The exhibition’s title was clearly a nod to nineteenth-century topographic photography under the initial exploratory auspices of the U.S. Geological Survey, as well as an acknowledgment of the alteration of that terrain during the century intervening—an acknowledgement missing from mid- century photographs by Ansel Adams. An art book titled Landscape: Theory published by Lustrum Press in 1980, which included a number of the New Topographics photographers, helped cement their prominence. Guggenheim awards and the blessings of art photography doyen and Museum of Modern Art’s head photographic curator John Szarkowski secured the group’s place in the annals of art and landscape photography, as well as in the photography art market.

Yet virtually lost to this history of the New Topographics photography’s fine arts pedigree is the fact that the Rochester exhibition of the New Topographics photographers, curated by William Jenkins, specified a debt to the deadpan photographic series of Conceptual artist Edward Ruscha. To paraphrase curator Jenkins, it is not what Rucha’s photographs are of so much as it is what they are about (Jenkins, 1975, p.5). Though Ruscha’s photographs were of gas stations along Route 66 or of every building on the Sunset Strip, they were about a series of aesthetic issues: as photographer John Schott has asserted, “[Ruscha’s pictures] are not statements about the world through art, they are statements about art through the world” (cited in Jenkins, 1975, p.5).

Similarly, while New Topographic photographs appear to be of western landscapes, trees, deserts, houses, roads, and construction, they are nonetheless about the aesthetic discourse of landscape photography, and about “a man-made wilderness” (Ratliff, 1976, p.86): that is, they are about the American myths of the West, suburban expansion, the American dream, and the exploitation and destruction of natural resources. Although Bright observed that “[b]eauty, preservation, development, exploitation, regulation…are historical matters in flux, not essential conditions of landscape”; nonetheless, they are essential conditions of the cultural construction of “landscape”; conditions, as Bright would doubtless agree, serving specific political and even ideological ends.


While American western expansion in the 1870s was in part encouraged as a means to help unify North and South in the wake of the Civil War, western expansion after World War II was part of the newly-affluent, newly-mobile middleclass tourist experience. The “aesthetics” of this experience in photographs by Ansel Adams, as Bright observed, was “well suited to the conservative social climate of a post-World War II United States basking in its reborn Manifest Destiny as a world superpower” (Bright, 1993, p.129; 1990).2

Well-versed in this American landscape tradition from the U.S. Geological Survey photographs by William Henry Jackson and Carlton Watkins to the now-iconic post-war western landscapes of Ansel Adams, New Topographics photographers appropriated many of the formal compositional elements by which landscape photography—and even landscape painting before it—was known.

For example, the traditional horizontal, “landscape” format that takes its name from the genre and intended to imply the endless sweep of land beyond the picture’s frame, in many of the photographic canvases of Robert Adams and Lewis Baltz square, instead emphasizes the domestic containment of the land. Further, landscape’s traditional midline placement of the horizon for compositional balance between earth and sky is often repositioned by New Topographics photographers above or below midline, or is even absent, rendering the landscape cluttered, unbalanced, or constrained rather than pristine and endless. The use of foliage to frame a distant view, which early U.S.G.S. topographic photographers such as Carlton Watkins borrowed from eighteenth- century romantic landscape painting, as well as to give a sense of scale; is rendered by Robert Adams in On Signal Hill overlooking Long Beach, California (1983) as pathos— the tree in the foreground is not only dwarfed by the enormous sprawl of the city behind it, but it also acts as a lone and pathetic reminder of what has been displaced by urban development.

Other recognizable landscape photography conceits utilized by Ansel Adams and Edward Weston included a point of view chosen to occlude any presence of humans, including the photographer himself, in order to maintain the fantasy of a wilderness untouched by man. By contrast, in Robert Adams’s On Lookout Mountain, next to Buffalo Bill’s grave, Jefferson County, Colorado (1970), for example, the photographer’s perspective from far-flung cliffs includes graffiti, demonstrating that there are few places, regardless how remote, where humans have not been or not marked by their presence. Visual tropes of nature, such as landscape photography’s inclusion of bodies of water for mirrored symmetry, fertility, and preternatural calm are all fodder for compositional parody by the New Topographics. Instead, man-made roads, tunnels, and byways break up the land rather than superimpose symmetry upon the view of the land; and mysterious, natural phenomena, such as steam rising from the sulphur springs that first fascinated the U.S. Geological Survey photographers such as W. H. Jackson in 1875 is, in Lewis Baltz’s Sunflower Condominiums During Construction, Looking West (1978), not steam from a mysterious, preternatural source, but the dust from new construction. Note, too, that whereas photograph titles used by the U.S.G.S. that incorporate cardinal direction (“looking west”) ostensibly for orientation nonetheless managed to instill “west” as a distinctly American concept; the New Topographics photographer’s similar use of topographic titling laconically acknowledges cardinal orientation as the contemporary developer’s dream of open, profitable land.


Frame for a tract house. Colorado Springs, from The New West, Robert Adams

Sunday School. A church in a new tract. Colorado Springs, from The New West, Robert Adams

Colorado Springs, from The New West, Robert Adams

Indeed, such specific and even famous photographs as Ansel Adams’s Moonrise over Hernandez, New Mexico (1944) are invoked by Robert Adams’s Fort Collins, Colorado (1976) some 30 years later in order to show us suburban habitation illuminated by that same moon—a parking lot that holds surrounding undeveloped land at bay while importing a small, cordoned bit of nature within itself for decorative and humanistic purposes. Robert Adams’s photograph even slyly suggests that the moon is the source for what in fact turns out to be artificial illumination by a nearby streetlamp.

The irony of these photographs, as Jenkins suggests of Ruscha, is that they are of landscape but about the discursive construction of landscape and the literal destruction of the land, a kind of irony that is part of the modus operandi of conceptual art. Though irony has been considered at length in literary studies—as a trope, a device, and a mode—it has generated little more than passing commentary in art history and criticism.3 Irony remains Conceptual art’s primary legacy for contemporary art and photography, yet the phenomenon is little understood by the scholars and critics who acknowledge its appearance in art since the Vietnam War.


I would venture to say here that it is the work’s irony that both frustrates Bright’s own social agenda—as it did many critics in the 1980s—and is the defining characteristic New Topographics photography. I would further argue that it is the irony itself that, in New Topographics photography, expands what Bright characterizes as landscape photography’s “narrow, self-reflexive project,” though it does so in a more opaque fashion than perhaps she would prefer. Bright’s reluctance to acknowledge the work of irony in New Topographic landscapes is symptomatic of art and culture of the United States from the 1980s onward.

For the culture of the United States is one that does not much care for irony or ethical ambiguity. Photography, despite more than a century’s evidence of easy manipulation, nonetheless remains a medium from which we expect transparency. We are, perhaps, never more frustrated than when the photograph fails to tell us what it means or is about something other than what it is a picture of. I would argue that the ethical ambiguity of these works critiques us more than Bright acknowledges: Robert Adams’s cropping of the word “Frontier” on his photograph of a Colorado gas station (“Frontier” gas station and Pikes Peak, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 1969) forces us to complete the word that might otherwise have been so obvious as to be overlooked. In so doing, we have the opportunity to acknowledge that we have always been complicit both in the frontier myth of the West and in its destruction. Thus, as the late Craig Owens asserted, irony “is a negative trope calculated to expose false consciousness” (Owens, 1992, p.149).

Photographs by New Topographics photographers indisputably romanticize their subject, for all that they reflect the depredations of the landscape. As a Westerner who grew up during the period chronicled by the New Topographics, and in daily contact with the vestiges of the West’s unfulfilled American Dream pictured by them, I admittedly want to defend these photographs against what is, in part, the detached Easterner’s pointed and justifiably impassioned social criticism. The New Topographics’ coupling of nascent cynicism with formal aesthetics “risks,” as Charles Hagen observed in a review of Baltz’s work, “lapsing into a weary disgust that, in a perverse transformation, could almost become acceptance—the limpid Western light, which in many ways has always been Baltz’s real subject, gilds equally junk and land, detritus and sky. But Baltz’s spare formal vocabulary keeps the pictures from sinking into sentimentality” (Hagen, 1989). Indeed, the laconic irony of many of the photographs preserves their romanticism—the era from which, after all, modern irony stemmed—while reminding us of the true definition of nostalgia—to long for a version of the past that never truly existed.

Moreover, does the New Topographics photographers’ “failure” to judge for us in the photographs relieve us of that responsibility?4 Might not the ethical ambiguity of the works themselves function as a critical tool, as many have argued about Conceptual and postmodern art, and thus more firmly implicate us in their critique of ideology? My interest in the New Topographics is part of an ongoing interest in the fate of ideology critique itself under post-industrial capitalism’s rampant and pervasive commodification of it. Indeed, given the increasing omnipresence and vacuity of form under our corporate culture industry, much of postmodern art, like the post-structuralist critique to which it is often linked, takes form and formal issues as its point of entry.5 My own interest in the New Topographics, some 20 years after Bright’s essay, anticipates, perhaps, the possibility of a larger renewed interest signaled by the 2005 acquisition of Robert Adams’s photographic oeuvre by Yale University, as well as the popularity of “new” naturalist writing by authors such as Barbara Kingsolver (2001) and Michael Pollan (1991, 2002), and an increase in art historical scholarship on previously overlooked artists and movements from the sixties and seventies (Kwon, 2004; Lee, 2006, 2001; Molesworth, 2003). Indeed, whereas Ansel Adams’s work remains a popular subject for coffee table books and an adornment of Sierra Club wall and engagement calendars, few today outside the art world and cultural élite are familiar with New Topographics.

The false consciousness exposed by the New Topographics’ irony is that the West was ever pristine, ever uninhabited: Even the nineteenth-century photographer, to get his view, left footprints (Banham, 1987, p.5). The false consciousness exposed by the New Topographic’s irony is, perhaps, that these photographs are less about the “man-altered landscape” than what California cultural and architectural historian Reyner Banham called the “man-mauled desert” (1987, p.2). The photographs are often beautiful not only because of the photographer’s eye, although Szarkowsky and others would have us believe this the whole story, but because we can be moved by such naked juxtapositions of human exploitation and the beauty of the constructed landscape—all we have ever truly known of nature despite a century’s worth of landscape photographs that have attempted to convince us otherwise. Indeed, as Banham further suggests, the “irony is that this beauty is itself a product of careless human ambition” (1987, pp.4-5).


Kelly Dennis teaches modern and contemporary art history and photography at the University of Connecticut. She has published extensively on photography, pornography, and performance art.



1 The most important essay outlining these histories is Bright, D. (1993), as part of a series of projects addressing the ideological currency of landscape in the post-war United States. See also Bright (1992; 1990).
2 The aesthetics of Adams’s photographs also indirectly served post-war petroleum,
automobile, and lead industries in their drive to expand automobile dominance by destroying mass transit and alternative and safe fuels (Mintz 2006, Kitman, 2000).
3 The exception is Craig Owens work (1992), esp. pp. 52-87.
4 Compare Roland Barthes regarding the dispossession of viewer judgment in “shock- photos” (Barthes, 1979, pp.71-73).
5 This essay is part of the author’s larger project on irony and aesthetics in Western landscape photography.


Banham, R. (1987) Introduction, in: Misrach, R. Desert Cantos (Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press).
Barthes, R. (1979) The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies (New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, Inc.).
Bright, D. (1993) Of Mother Nature and Marlboro Men: An Inquiry into the Cultural Meanings of Landscape Photography, revised reprint in: Bolton, R. (Ed.) The Contest of Meaning pp. 125-143 (Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press). Originally published in: exposure 23:1 (1985).
—— (1992) The Machine in the Garden Revisited: American Environmentalism and
Photographic Aesthetics, pp. 60-71 in: Art Journal 51:2 (summer).
—— (1990) Victory Gardens: The Public Landscape of Postwar America, in: VIEWS
Hagen, Charles (1989) Lewis Baltz: Castelli Graphics, p. 148 in: Artforum International
28 (November).
Jenkins, William (1975) Introduction to The New Topographics in: New Topographics: Photographs of a Man-Altered Landscape (Rochester, NY, The Museum).
Jussim, Estelle (1985) Landscape as Photograph (New Haven, Yale University Press). Kingsolver, B. (2001) Prodigal Summer: A Novel (New York, Harper Perennial).
Kitman, J. L. (2000) The Secret History of Lead, in: The Nation (March 20) [Online] Available at
Kwon, M. (2004) One Place after Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity
(Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
Lee, P.M. (2006) Chronophobia: On Time in the Art of the 1960s (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
—— (2001) Object to Be Destroyed: The Work of Gordon Matta-Clark
(Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
Mintz, M. (2006) Road to Perdition, in: The Nation (May 31) [Online] Available at:
Molesworth, H. Ed. (2003) Work Ethic (Baltimore: Baltimore Museum of Art).
Owens, C. (1992) Beyond Recognition: Representation, Power, and Culture
(Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).
Pollan, M. (2002) Botany of Desire: A Plant’s-Eye View of the World (New York, Random House Trade Paperbacks).
—— (1991) Second Nature: A Gardener’s Education (New York, Bantam
Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.)
Ratcliff, C. (1976) Route 66 Revisited: The New Landscape Photography, pp. 86-91 in: Art in America (Jan/Feb).

Posted in Essays, Featured and tagged , , , , , , , , .


  1. 69 al estilo futanari
    Sexo amateur con una pareja asiГЎtica Riley Reynolds gibt eine Massage mit einem sehr – Nur.XXX
    Huevos hasta el fondo dentro de latina
    Follando un culo asiГЎtico

  2. I simply want to say I’m very new to blogs and actually savored your web site. More than likely I’m planning to bookmark your blog post . You absolutely come with good posts. Many thanks for revealing your web page.

  3. Wow, superb blog structure! How lengthy have you ever been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The entire glance of your website is excellent, let alone the content!

  4. of course like your website however you need to take a look at the spelling on quite a few of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling issues and I in finding it very troublesome to inform the reality nevertheless I¡¦ll surely come again again.

  5. My husband and i felt now glad Albert could complete his web research through the precious recommendations he acquired while using the blog. It is now and again perplexing to just happen to be giving for free strategies which often most people have been making money from. And we fully grasp we have you to give thanks to for this. The type of illustrations you made, the simple web site menu, the friendships you can help create – it is most great, and it’s leading our son in addition to us imagine that that idea is exciting, which is quite pressing. Thanks for everything!

  6. Someone necessarily assist to make critically posts I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your website page and to this point? I surprised with the research you made to make this actual post extraordinary. Fantastic task!

  7. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again very soon!

  8. Wow, superb blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site is wonderful, as well as the content!

  9. Good web site! I really love how it is easy on my eyes and the data are well written. I am wondering how I might be notified whenever a new post has been made. I’ve subscribed to your feed which must do the trick! Have a great day!

  10. Whats up very nice web site!! Man .. Excellent .. Wonderful .. I’ll bookmark your web site and take the feeds additionally…I am glad to seek out numerous useful information right here in the put up, we need work out extra techniques on this regard, thanks for sharing.

  11. I am writing to make you understand of the nice discovery my girl experienced reading through your site. She discovered a lot of pieces, which included what it’s like to have a very effective giving spirit to let most people very easily learn about some impossible subject areas. You really did more than her expectations. Many thanks for distributing the effective, healthy, educational and also easy thoughts on this topic to Kate.

  12. I am so happy to read this. This is the type of manual that needs to be given and not the random misinformation that is at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this best doc.

  13. Just wish to say your article is as astounding. The clearness in your post is just excellent and i can assume you’re an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the rewarding work.

  14. Nice weblog right here! Additionally your site loads up very fast! What host are you using? Can I am getting your affiliate link in your host? I desire my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  15. What i do not realize is actually how you’re not actually a lot more well-liked than you might be right now. You are so intelligent. You already know thus considerably with regards to this matter, made me in my opinion consider it from numerous various angles. Its like women and men don’t seem to be fascinated unless it is one thing to do with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs outstanding. All the time care for it up!

  16. I have been exploring for a bit for any high-quality articles or blog posts on this sort of space . Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this website. Studying this info So i¡¦m glad to show that I have a very just right uncanny feeling I found out exactly what I needed. I such a lot definitely will make certain to do not disregard this website and give it a glance regularly.

  17. I like this post, enjoyed this one thanks for putting up. “What is a thousand years Time is short for one who thinks, endless for one who yearns.” by Alain.

  18. Normally I do not read article on blogs, however I would like to say that this write-up very forced me to take a look at and do it! Your writing taste has been amazed me. Thank you, very great post.

  19. Only wanna comment on few general things, The website style and design is perfect, the articles is real excellent. “The sun sets without thy assistance.” by The Talmud.

  20. One other issue is when you are in a predicament where you don’t have a cosigner then you may actually want to try to wear out all of your school funding options. You’ll find many grants and other free college funding that will provide you with finances that can help with classes expenses. Thanks alot : ) for the post.

  21. Great blog here! Also your website loads up fast! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  22. Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. Numerous people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  23. I wanted to put you that very little observation to help say thanks as before about the nice basics you have provided on this website. It was so extremely open-handed of people like you in giving unhampered what most people might have offered for sale as an e-book to generate some money for themselves, especially given that you could possibly have tried it in the event you desired. Those techniques additionally acted to provide a fantastic way to be certain that other individuals have the identical dream the same as my own to know great deal more with regard to this matter. Certainly there are numerous more fun opportunities in the future for folks who read your blog post.

  24. I intended to write you the little bit of note to be able to thank you so much the moment again relating to the amazing opinions you have shown in this article. It is quite incredibly open-handed of people like you to deliver easily just what numerous people would have offered for an e book to earn some money for themselves, and in particular now that you could possibly have tried it if you ever considered necessary. Those ideas additionally worked like a easy way to know that most people have a similar desire similar to my personal own to realize whole lot more pertaining to this problem. I’m certain there are some more enjoyable occasions up front for individuals that look into your blog post.

  25. I’m very happy to read this. This is the kind of manual that needs to be given and not the random misinformation that is at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this greatest doc.

  26. I think other web site proprietors should take this web site as an model, very clean and great user friendly style and design, let alone the content. You’re an expert in this topic!

  27. Magnificent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too wonderful. I really like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you are stating and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it sensible. I cant wait to read far more from you. This is really a terrific web site.

  28. you are actually a excellent webmaster. The website loading speed is incredible. It sort of feels that you’re doing any distinctive trick. Moreover, The contents are masterwork. you’ve done a magnificent job in this matter!

  29. Magnificent beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your web site, how can i subscribe for a blog site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept

  30. I do trust all of the ideas you have presented on your post. They’re very convincing and will definitely work. Nonetheless, the posts are very brief for novices. Could you please prolong them a bit from next time? Thanks for the post.

  31. It¡¦s really a great and useful piece of information. I¡¦m satisfied that you just shared this useful info with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

  32. I like the helpful info you provide in your articles. I’ll bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly. I am quite sure I’ll learn plenty of new stuff right here! Good luck for the next!

  33. I have been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.

  34. Whats Taking place i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It absolutely helpful and it has helped me out loads. I hope to give a contribution & help other users like its aided me. Great job.

  35. Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it is truly informative. I’m gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. Lots of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  36. Hi there! I just would like to give you a huge thumbs up for the excellent information you have right here on this post. I will be coming back to your blog for more soon.

  37. Hello, i think that i saw you visited my site so i got here to return the desire?.I’m trying to find issues to improve my site!I guess its good enough to make use of a few of your ideas!!

  38. Hello there, I discovered your blog by the use of Google while looking for a comparable topic, your website got here up, it looks good. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

  39. Hello there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it is truly informative. I’m going to watch out for brussels. I’ll be grateful if you continue this in future. Lots of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  40. Its like you read my mind! You seem to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you can do with a few pics to drive the message home a little bit, but other than that, this is great blog. A fantastic read. I’ll definitely be back.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.